Speaker summary
48%25 analyzed articles/videos3,180.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyndsey Fifield results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 404.197 hits. Analysis detected 4,369.905 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180.667 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,210 of 28,364 speakers). This Lyndsey Fifield is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score25 analyzed videos3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate