Speaker summary
40%6 analyzed articles/videos656.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Porter results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 115.622 hits. Analysis detected 425.803 faulty-reasoning hits from 656.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Katie Porter is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
4.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos656.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate