Speaker summary
ā 67% 23 analyzed articles/videos 1,153.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kash Patel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 296.707 hits . Analysis detected 2,498.219 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,153.667 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ā 7% (25,029 of 26,654 speakers). This Kash Patel is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Kash Patel
Speaker details
Total words: 1,153.667
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.4% BS Score23 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst