Salon76%

“Wasting their time”: Trump swats down FBI investigation into Graham’s death 55%

By Alex Galbraith75%

7/14/2026, 8:09:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 301 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,623 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the article peer group.

FBI Director Kash Patel put the resources of his agency at the disposal of authorities looking into Sen. 
Lindsey Graham ‘s death. 
His boss seems to think that’s a mistake. 
 I know there’s all sorts of conspiracy theories going along, and I don’t think the FBI… I think the FBI is wasting their time if they’re doing that,” Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday. 
The Republican senator from South Carolina died over the weekend at the age of 71 . 
Graham’s office said his death was likely caused by an “aortic dissection,” citing a preliminary report from the Washington, D.C. medical examiner’s office. 
Kash Patel fuels conspiracy theories about Lindsey Graham’s death 
Trump put stock in that early finding and wished that Graham had taken “better care of himself.” 
“At first, I heard it was clogged arteries. 
Because he did have clogged arteries. 
He had a problem with that,” he said. 
“But what happened is actually something that’s very hard to detect. 
It was not related to any blockage.” 
Start your day with essential news from Salon. 
Sign up for our free morning newsletter , Crash Course. 
Trump said that doctors he spoke to said there was “not much” Graham could have done different. 
Axios reported that Graham told an associate that he was feeling unwell shortly before his death. 
When that person urged him to go to the doctor, Graham said that he’d do so after a planned appearance on “Meet the Press.” 
“I can’t die now,” he reportedly joked. 
“I still need to do the Russia sanctions, get Iran sorted out.” 
There were two Lindsey Grahams 
The story Lindsey Graham mourners are telling 
“This is a big blow”: Trump uses Graham’s death to push SAVE America Act 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.3%Alex Galbraith: 5.6%Salon: 5.2%Confirmation Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Alex Galbraith: 2.0%Salon: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.1%Salon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Alex Galbraith: 4.3%Salon: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias6.0%This article: 32.9%Alex Galbraith: 14.4%Salon: 7.3%Framing Effect32.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.2%Salon: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.2%Salon: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 1.4%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 4.0%Salon: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Alex Galbraith: 11.6%Salon: 10.8%Negativity Bias15.9%This article: 25.2%Alex Galbraith: 3.5%Salon: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias25.2%This article: 2.7%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.4%Salon: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Alex Galbraith: 2.2%Salon: 1.9%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.8%Salon: 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.2%Salon: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.3%Salon: 3.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.6%Alex Galbraith: 1.5%Salon: 3.1%Appeal to Authority15.6%This article: 1.7%Alex Galbraith: 1.2%Salon: 2.3%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.8%Salon: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.0%Alex Galbraith: 7.5%Salon: 10.6%Hasty Generalization14.0%This article: 4.7%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.2%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.0%Alex Galbraith: 12.3%Salon: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion14.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.8%Salon: 1.4%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 8.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.0%Salon: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.7%Salon: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.9%Salon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.6%Alex Galbraith: 0.9%Salon: 2.5%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%Alex Galbraith: 1.4%Salon: 2.1%Unattributed Quote2.7%This article: 11.6%Alex Galbraith: 4.2%Salon: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection11.6%This article: 11.6%Alex Galbraith: 12.0%Salon: 15.1%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 6.4%Salon: 7.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Alex Galbraith: 3.4%Salon: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

301 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers55%attributed speech135writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGraham’s office • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAxios • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

93%flagged-word coverage
109 attributed words66% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+32.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 32.1%32.1%Biased Writer Voice+32.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 32.1%32.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+7.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 7.3%7.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.