Topic summary
38% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Graham results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 3,022 hits . Analysis detected 38,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,726 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,965 of 15,689 topics). This Lindsey Graham is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Lindsey Graham
Topic details
Total words: 44,726
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles44.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst