Author summary
62% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graig Graziosi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 2,602 hits . Analysis detected 17,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,752 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,392 of 6,137 authors). This Graig Graziosi is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Graig Graziosi
Author details
Total words: 18,752
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst