Tesla recalls some Cybertrucks over fears the wheels will fall off: report 30%

By Graig Graziosi62%

5/8/2026, 9:23:18 PM

Topics: Tesla, Elon Musk

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 694 faulty-reasoning hits from 359 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (14,490 of 20,448 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the article peer group.

Tesla is recalling its economy RWD Cybertrucks over fears the wheels might fall off, according to a new report. 
The company that made Elon Musk a household name  Tesla  is recalling 173 of it's RWD Cybertruck Long Range vehicles due to faulty break rotors that could cause the wheels to dislodge from the vehicle, according to a MotorTrend report. 
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a notice announcing the recall, saying the vehicles' “brake rotor stud holes may crack and allow the stud to separate from the wheel hub.” 
Affected vehicles may vibrate or produce noise prior to wheel stud separation, but the cracking may be undetected, according to the notice. 
Tesla said in a statement that it is “not aware of any collisions, fatalities, or injuries” related to the issue at the heart of the recall. 
All 173 Tesla RWD Cybertrucks have been recalled due to an issue that can result in the vehicles' wheels falling off (Getty) 
The Cybertruck has been the subject of, at this point, nearly a dozen recalls, according to The Verge. 
The trucks' accelerator, trim, inverter, reverse cameras, and font size have all been the subject of recalls across various models. 
The RWD  rear-wheel drive  model was launched in April 2025, but was a short lived offering; Tesla discountined the line after only a few months. 
Since then, the company has launched a cheaper version of the Cybertruck with dual motors and all-wheel drive which costs $60,000. 
That model is not impacted by the latest recall. 
“On affected vehicles, higher severity road perturbations and cornering may strain the stud hole in the wheel rotor, causing cracks to form,” Tesla said in a statement. 
“If cracking propagates with continued use and strain, the wheel stud could eventually separate from the wheel hub.” 
Tesla said it will completely replace the wheel hubs and rotors on affected vehicles at no cost to owners, as is mandated by law. 
The manufacturer's recall number is SB-26-33-003. 
Owners can contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. 
The Independent has requested comment from Tesla. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.7%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Graig Graziosi: 3.6%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 8.6%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic8.6%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Graig Graziosi: 8.4%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect14.8%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.1%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.1%Graig Graziosi: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias13.1%This article: 5.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 45.4%Graig Graziosi: 13.9%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias45.4%This article: 6.7%Graig Graziosi: 2.3%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.9%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Graig Graziosi: 3.4%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.5%Graig Graziosi: 1.2%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.3%Graig Graziosi: 6.0%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority20.3%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope5.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.0%Graig Graziosi: 4.0%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 8.3%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.5%Graig Graziosi: 2.2%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.6%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division5.6%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Graig Graziosi: 1.9%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.7%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading6.7%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.1%Graig Graziosi: 2.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote6.1%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.4%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 7.0%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

359 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers48%attributed speech186writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration • 22 words • 100.0% coverageTesla • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageThe Verge • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTesla • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTesla • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTesla • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageThe Independent • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Verge

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words10% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%The Verge: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.