Topic summary
79% 24 analyzed articles/videos 7,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Musk results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 7,801 hits . Analysis detected 64,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,707 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,692 of 15,778 topics). This Elon Musk is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Elon Musk
Topic details
Total words: 53,707
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score24 analyzed articles53.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst