Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Constance Grady results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 2,279 hits . Analysis detected 13,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,712 of 6,611 authors). This Constance Grady is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Constance Grady
Author details
Total words: 10,264
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.2% 22.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst