Elon Musk's 2-year-old 'warning' to iPhone maker about ChatGPT-maker resurfaces, as Apple accuses OpenAI of stealing trade secrets; Musk said: They are selling ... 25%

By TOI Tech Desk0%

7/10/2026, 11:07:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Quote-first Misdirection, and Primacy Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 704 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,507 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the article peer group.

A two-year-old warning from tech billionaire Elon Musk has resurfaced online following the news that Apple has officially sued its artificial intelligence (AI) partner, OpenAI, for trade secret theft. 
Apple filed a lawsuit on Friday, July 10, in the Northern District of California, accusing the ChatGPT creator of running a coordinated espionage campaign to systematically steal secret hardware designs, physical prototypes and supplier data. 
OpenAI has denied the allegations The lawsuit has bright spotlight back onto Musk’s historical warning about the fragile alliance between the two tech giants. 
Two years ago, when Apple first announced it would deeply integrate OpenAI's software features directly into its operating systems, Musk was critical of the arrangement. 
“It’s patently absurd that Apple isn’t smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy!” 
Musk warned at the time in a post, which has been reshared by Doge Designer, saying, “Elon Musk warned Apple about OpenAI two years ago.” 
“Apple has no clue what's actually going on once they hand your data over to OpenAI. 
They're selling you down the river,” the post, shared on June 11, 2024, said. 
Apple lawsuit: OpenAI ‘stole’ data 
The iPhone maker claims that OpenAI built up its rising consumer hardware division by targeting, poaching and extracting corporate secrets from Apple engineers. 
The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI went so far as to use its recruitment process to harvest trade secrets, encouraging job candidates to bring physical Apple prototypes and blueprints to their interviews, and using proprietary information to secretly approach Apple’s own manufacturing suppliers. 
The legal complaint explicitly names two major high-profile defections: Tang Tan who serves as the chief hardware officer at OpenAI and Chang Liu, a former iPhone hardware engineer who left the company to join OpenAI in January. 
OpenAI rejects Apple’s allegations 
Apple’s lawsuit formally charges the defendants with “trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract,” claiming that OpenAI's leadership actively normalized and encouraged the corporate misconduct. 
OpenAI has fired back. 
Drew Pusateri, OpenAI's Director of Strategic Communications, took to X to issue a swift, absolute denial of the theft. 
“We have no interest in other companies' trade secrets. 
We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere,” OpenAI said in the statement. 
Get the latest technology news and updates. 
Download the TOI App. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.0%TOI Tech Desk: 4.6%The Times of India: 4.4%Confirmation Bias1.0%This article: 5.8%TOI Tech Desk: 1.4%The Times of India: 1.8%Anchoring Bias5.8%This article: 1.2%TOI Tech Desk: 2.1%The Times of India: 5.1%Availability Heuristic1.2%This article: 8.9%TOI Tech Desk: 2.2%The Times of India: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic8.9%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 3.2%The Times of India: 1.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%TOI Tech Desk: 3.7%The Times of India: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 6.5%TOI Tech Desk: 6.8%The Times of India: 5.8%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 3.4%TOI Tech Desk: 1.7%The Times of India: 0.9%Loss Aversion3.4%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 1.0%The Times of India: 0.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%TOI Tech Desk: 1.6%The Times of India: 0.9%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 20.8%TOI Tech Desk: 7.0%The Times of India: 6.1%Negativity Bias20.8%This article: 2.2%TOI Tech Desk: 1.1%The Times of India: 2.8%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 3.9%TOI Tech Desk: 1.0%The Times of India: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%TOI Tech Desk: 1.0%The Times of India: 0.5%Halo Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%TOI Tech Desk: 1.8%The Times of India: 1.0%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 10.6%TOI Tech Desk: 2.7%The Times of India: 1.5%Primacy Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%TOI Tech Desk: 4.2%The Times of India: 2.4%Ad Hominem3.9%This article: 1.2%TOI Tech Desk: 0.3%The Times of India: 0.2%Straw Man1.2%This article: 10.6%TOI Tech Desk: 2.7%The Times of India: 4.3%Appeal to Authority10.6%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 1.6%The Times of India: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.2%TOI Tech Desk: 6.0%The Times of India: 4.1%Hasty Generalization16.2%This article: 3.9%TOI Tech Desk: 1.0%The Times of India: 0.5%Red Herring3.9%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%TOI Tech Desk: 6.1%The Times of India: 17.5%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%TOI Tech Desk: 1.6%The Times of India: 7.0%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%TOI Tech Desk: 1.6%The Times of India: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%TOI Tech Desk: 2.5%The Times of India: 3.2%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 13.0%TOI Tech Desk: 6.5%The Times of India: 3.6%Quote-first Misdirection13.0%This article: 2.2%TOI Tech Desk: 2.0%The Times of India: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice2.2%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%TOI Tech Desk: 0.0%The Times of India: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%TOI Tech Desk: 2.7%The Times of India: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

414 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers47%attributed speech219writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageApple • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 27 words • 100.0% coverageElon Musk • 25 words • 100.0% coverageElon Musk • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageApple • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageDrew Pusateri • 19 words • 0.0% coverageOpenAI • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOpenAI • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Elon Musk

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words35% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+33.3 ptsWriter: 6.4%Elon Musk: 39.7%39.7%Quote-first Misdirection+23.5 ptsWriter: 13.2%Elon Musk: 36.8%36.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.