Publication summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Times of India results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 2,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 77% (93 of 399 publications). This The Times of India is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst