Author summary
22%5 analyzed articles/videos2,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These agencies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 4,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,822 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,339 of 6,244 authors). This agencies is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
agencies
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
15%agencies (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,822
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate