Author summary
22% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These agencies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 709 hits . Analysis detected 4,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,822 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,339 of 6,244 authors). This agencies is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. agencies
Author details
Total words: 8,822
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst