Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Yerushalmy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,473 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,036 of 6,162 authors). This Jonathan Yerushalmy is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Jonathan Yerushalmy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
2%Jonathan Yerushalmy (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,473
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate