Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warren Murray results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,920 of 6,348 authors). This Warren Murray is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Warren Murray
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%Warren Murray (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Horn Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos