Topic summary
26%3 analyzed articles/videos1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Lawsuits results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 3,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,041 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,829 of 15,558 topics). This Tech Lawsuits is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Tech Lawsuits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,041
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate