Author summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Feiner results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 3,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,437 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,641 of 6,263 authors). This Lauren Feiner is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Lauren Feiner
Author details
Total words: 2,437
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst