The Verge56%

States make last-ditch effort to stop the Paramount ‘media behemoth’ 71%

By Lauren Feiner52%

7/13/2026, 6:35:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 316 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,464 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the article peer group.

A dozen state attorneys general are trying to block the $110 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery they warn would raise movie prices and crush cable TV distributors. 
The states  California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington  filed suit on Monday, arguing the combination would illegally harm competition and create a “media behemoth.” 
Last month, the Justice Department declined to block the merger in a decision that The Wall Street Journal reported surprised career staff who were leaning toward recommending a lawsuit. 
In an exit interview with Politico, former DOJ acting antitrust chief Omeed Assefi rejected the report as “not accurate.” 
But according to the states’ lawsuit, the merger would result in a consolidation of two out of the five “major film distributors” and basic cable channel owners, meaning that, “for every dollar generated by wide-release theatrical films and basic cable channels in this country, the combined company will pocket more than a quarter.” 
In a press release, Paramount said the lawsuit was “based on a misrepresentation of competition in the entertainment industry today” and that delaying it would harm consumers and entertainment talent. 
The merger has raised alarms both in Hollywood and in political circles, in part because it would put CNN under the control of David Ellison, son of close President Donald Trump ally Larry Ellison. 
Some former CBS journalists have warned of politically charged interference in programming after Ellison tapped The Free Press founder Bari Weiss to head the network, and ratings under Weiss have reportedly dipped. 
The lawsuit threatens to be costly for Paramount if it delays the deal from closing by September 30th. 
It’s committed to a 25 cent per share “ticking fee” to WBD shareholders for each quarter it’s delayed beyond that, about $650 million per quarter. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.9%Lauren Feiner: 4.7%The Verge: 3.6%Confirmation Bias26.9%This article: 24.7%Lauren Feiner: 3.2%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias24.7%This article: 19.6%Lauren Feiner: 4.9%The Verge: 3.8%Availability Heuristic19.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 9.2%Lauren Feiner: 1.2%The Verge: 0.7%Hindsight Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 1.2%The Verge: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.3%Lauren Feiner: 16.8%The Verge: 6.2%Framing Effect25.3%This article: 13.6%Lauren Feiner: 2.5%The Verge: 0.9%Loss Aversion13.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.6%The Verge: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Lauren Feiner: 2.0%The Verge: 2.4%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 33.5%Lauren Feiner: 13.2%The Verge: 9.7%Negativity Bias33.5%This article: 15.5%Lauren Feiner: 6.9%The Verge: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.8%The Verge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias6.0%This article: 10.8%Lauren Feiner: 2.8%The Verge: 0.6%In-Group Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 3.3%The Verge: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Lauren Feiner: 1.2%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Lauren Feiner: 1.4%The Verge: 1.1%Ad Hominem10.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.2%Lauren Feiner: 3.2%The Verge: 4.0%Appeal to Authority15.2%This article: 5.7%Lauren Feiner: 0.7%The Verge: 1.6%False Dilemma5.7%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.8%Lauren Feiner: 6.9%The Verge: 6.8%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 10.1%Lauren Feiner: 1.3%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring10.1%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.5%Lauren Feiner: 7.2%The Verge: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion9.5%This article: 20.9%Lauren Feiner: 6.6%The Verge: 1.1%Begging the Question20.9%This article: 10.1%Lauren Feiner: 3.9%The Verge: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.1%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.1%Lauren Feiner: 3.9%The Verge: 3.6%Anecdotal10.1%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.9%Lauren Feiner: 2.6%The Verge: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.9%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 9.5%Lauren Feiner: 1.2%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading9.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 2.8%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 53.8%Lauren Feiner: 8.6%The Verge: 2.6%Unattributed Quote53.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 2.4%The Verge: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 21.2%Lauren Feiner: 5.3%The Verge: 10.8%Biased Writer Voice21.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Feiner: 0.0%The Verge: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 19.6%Lauren Feiner: 2.5%The Verge: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias19.6%This article: 10.8%Lauren Feiner: 1.4%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.8%This article: 9.5%Lauren Feiner: 1.2%The Verge: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.5%

316 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech238writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageThe Wall Street Journal • 29 words • 0.0% coverageOmeed Assefi • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageParamount • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paramount

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words38% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Paramount: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+49.2 ptsWriter: 50.8%Paramount: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.2 ptsWriter: 28.2%Paramount: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-26.1 ptsWriter: 26.1%Paramount: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%Paramount: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.