Speaker summary
52% 71 analyzed articles/videos 2,438.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Musk results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 4,199.574 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,438.667 analyzed words across 71 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,722 of 25,889 speakers). This Elon Musk is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Elon Musk
Speaker details
Total words: 2,438.667
Article count: 71
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score71 analyzed videos2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst