Author summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos1,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shivali Best results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,037 hits. Analysis detected 10,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,030 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,002 of 6,362 authors). This Shivali Best is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Shivali Best
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
69%Shivali Best (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,030
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate