Topic summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tesla results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,428 hits . Analysis detected 17,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,207 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (8,874 of 15,966 topics). This Tesla is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Tesla
Topic details
Total words: 14,207
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst