Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Bernard Condon results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,270 hits . Analysis detected 6,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,388 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Bernard Condon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Bernard Condon
Author details
Total words: 6,388
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.9% 18.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst