Author summary
67% 8 analyzed articles/videos 9,822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camila Domonoske results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,630 hits . Analysis detected 27,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,881 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,260 of 6,140 authors). This Camila Domonoske is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Camila Domonoske
Author details
Total words: 35,881
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles35.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst