Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephan Bisaha results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,144 hits. Analysis detected 9,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,544 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (5,936 of 6,135 authors). This Stephan Bisaha is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Stephan Bisaha
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠4%Stephan Bisaha (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,544
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos