Nearly 180,000 tickets are still available through World Cup resale portals: report 41%

By Graig Graziosi62%

6/9/2026, 7:19:47 PM

Topics: Fifa, World Cup
Keywords: Fifa, World Cup, Internal

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,222 of 20,462 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the article peer group.

Soccer fans hoping to snag a World Cup 2026 ticket may be in luck; there's still approximately 180,000 tickets left in resale portals for the big tournament this summer. 
According to a new analysis by the Financial Times, nearly 180,000 tickets for the World Cup  which kicks off this Thursday  are for sale on FIFA's official resale portals. 
FIFA's ticket prices are so high for the tournament that in some cases scalpers have had to discount their holdings by approximately 20 percent just to move the paper, The Daily Beast reports. 
Tickets for even low-profile games in the U.S. can run fans around $140 per ticket. 
The most expensive tickets for the regular seats at the U.S. opener were priced at $2,735. 
That's more than the final cost for a seat at the 2022 World Cup final. 
The cheapest seats for the opener are around $1,000. 
The Athletic recently reported that the price for any game at any stage of the World Cup 2026 is higher than an equivalent ticket for any prior FIFA tournament. 
The World Cup will be hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico this year, but ticket sales have been the slowest for the U.S. games, according to the FT. 
There are still approximately 4,000 tickets on sale for the U.S. team's opening match against Paraguay at the SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, on June 13. 
According to NPR, those interested in seeing that match don't even have to go to the resale portal, as there were still approximately 132 regular tickets available as of Monday. 
Canada's opening match against Bosnia at BMO Field, Toronto, also on June 13, had 226 regular tickets left available as of Monday. 
Mexico's opener against South Africa, at the Mexico City Stadium on Thursday, is the only host country opening match to actually sell out. 
Despite all the political turmoil surrounding President Donald Trump's immigration and visa policies, ticketing experts have largely agreed that the largest contributor to poor ticket sales is FIFA's pricing. 
Even Trump himself said he wouldn't pay the prices FIFA was asking to watch a match. 
"I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," Trump told The New York Post. 
Swaths of empty seats at stadiums wouldn't look great for FIFA, which often claims that the World Cup is the "world's greatest sporting event." 
FIFA President Gianni Infantino boasted earlier this year that all 104 games were effectively "sold out," but that doesn't appear to have been true. 
Ben Shields, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, told NPR that the organization is likely hoping that the spectacle and excitement surrounding the tournament will help overshadow any perceived lack of interest caused by matches that don't sell out. 
"The hope or bet  for FIFA is that once the matches start  and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is," Shields said. 
"We shall see." 
In the meantime, tickets are still available not only through FIFA's portals, but also on third-party event apps like Ticketmaster and SeatGeek. 
As of Tuesday there were approximately 1,680 tickets available for Friday's U.S. opener, and 600 tickets on SeatGeek. 
*The Independent* has requested comment from FIFA. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.7%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Graig Graziosi: 1.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias9.2%This article: 9.5%Graig Graziosi: 3.6%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Graig Graziosi: 8.4%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.1%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias15.0%This article: 10.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias10.0%This article: 29.4%Graig Graziosi: 13.9%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias29.4%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.3%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error4.9%This article: 7.3%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.9%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Graig Graziosi: 3.4%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Graig Graziosi: 1.2%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.2%Graig Graziosi: 6.0%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority10.2%This article: 4.9%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 10.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope10.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 28.6%Graig Graziosi: 4.0%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization28.6%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.8%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Graig Graziosi: 8.3%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.6%Graig Graziosi: 2.2%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.6%This article: 2.7%Graig Graziosi: 0.6%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque2.7%This article: 0.5%Graig Graziosi: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.5%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.6%Graig Graziosi: 2.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal5.6%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.9%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 2.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.1%Graig Graziosi: 2.4%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.1%This article: 4.9%Graig Graziosi: 7.0%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice4.9%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.7%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Graig Graziosi: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Graig Graziosi: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.8%

588 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers53%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 31 words • 0.0% coverageFIFA • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThe Athletic • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNPR • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGianni Infantino • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBen Shields • 43 words • 0.0% coverageBen Shields • 59 words • 0.0% coverageBen Shields • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageThe Independent • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

FIFA

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words11% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.5 ptsWriter: 14.5%FIFA: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%FIFA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.