Speaker summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos227.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifa results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, False Dilemma, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 387 faulty-reasoning hits from 227.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (22,121 of 26,780 speakers). This Fifa is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
12.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos227.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos