Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kieran Jackson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 1,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (955 of 6,358 authors). This Kieran Jackson is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Kieran Jackson
Author details
Total words: 1,184
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.0% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.4% 13.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst