Author summary
â 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Zimmermann results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,796 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of â 21% (5,065 of 6,357 authors). This David Zimmermann is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. David Zimmermann
Author details
Total words: 3,796
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst