Speaker summary
49%16 analyzed articles/videos759.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kamala Harris results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 96.922 hits. Analysis detected 1,115.286 faulty-reasoning hits from 759.333 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,013 of 28,364 speakers). This Kamala Harris is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score16 analyzed videos759.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate