Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Jashinsky results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 842 hits. Analysis detected 4,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (876 of 6,358 authors). This Emily Jashinsky is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Emily Jashinsky
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠87%Emily Jashinsky (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 38.4%38.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.3%17.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.6%16.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos