Speaker summary
â 41% 17 analyzed articles/videos 901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Biden results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,515.405 faulty-reasoning hits from 901 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of â 3% (25,299 of 25,875 speakers). This Joe Biden is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Joe Biden
Speaker details
Total words: 901
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 4.8% BS Score17 analyzed videos901 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst