Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These J.T. Young results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 1,366 hits. Analysis detected 7,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This J.T. Young is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
J.T. Young
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%J.T. Young (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 42.2%42.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 32.9%32.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.4%27.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 12.0%12.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 42.2%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos