Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 1,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esther Bergdahl results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,365 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,828 of 6,629 authors). This Esther Bergdahl is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Esther Bergdahl
Author details
Total words: 4,365
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst