Author summary
19% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kiki Intarasuwan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 1,592 hits . Analysis detected 15,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,387 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (6,341 of 6,628 authors). This Kiki Intarasuwan is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Kiki Intarasuwan
Author details
Total words: 31,387
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst