Author summary
7%3 analyzed articles/videos4,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Sganga results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 770 hits. Analysis detected 9,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,227 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,004 of 6,216 authors). This Nicole Sganga is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Nicole Sganga
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
4%Nicole Sganga (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,227
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.4% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate