Biden to publish another memoir after midterm elections: Promise Me, America 41%

By Brady Knox49%

7/15/2026, 6:03:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 984 faulty-reasoning hits from 672 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,941 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the article peer group.

Former President Joe Biden announced the release of his new memoir, Promise Me, America , which is slated to hit shelves on Nov. 17, two weeks after the midterm elections . 
Memoirs have become a signature move for presidents after they leave office, providing both a lucrative source of income and a chance to have a say in their own legacy. 
This is particularly needed for Biden, 83, who has largely stayed out of the spotlight post-presidency as he weathers scathing attacks from critics and former allies alike over issues such as his health while in office and his decision to run for reelection. 
In a video announcement for the book, the former president took on a cheery tone. 
“Since after the presidency, I’ve had a lot of people ask me, ‘Joe, what have you been doing?’ 
I’ve been spending a lot of time with my family. 
I’m dealing with a cancer diagnosis, and I’ve been getting treatment, and it’s been going really well. 
I want to thank all those who have offered their prayers and support and well wishes,” Biden began in a voiceover, as the video showed him approaching a chair, interspersed with a montage of his presidency. 
“I’ve written a book about my time as president,” he added. 
The book’s release date has raised eyebrows, as Biden had previously said he would release his memoirs before the 2026 midterm elections. 
The changed date is almost certainly due to fear of negative attention toward the Democratic Party ahead of the elections. 
Democrats have struggled to put 2024 behind them, the conclusion of a period many in the party would like to forget. 
Biden laid out the reasons behind writing the book, saying it was “about the challenges we face as a nation, about the decisions I made, and why I made them. 
Leading the country through COVID, rebuilding our economy and restoring our democracy after the attack on January 6th, banning our nation’s longest war in Afghanistan, strengthening NATO, and supporting Ukraine.” 
He also said it was about “why I chose to run for reelection and why I chose to step aside,” the latter point being notable as it’s been largely established that he was forced out, causing lasting bitterness. 
“Most of all, it’s about my faith in the promise of America  the promise we made to those who’ve gone before us is to honor their sacrifice, the promises we made to one another, and to treat everyone with dignity and respect, and the promises we made to future generations of Americans, to remain the beacon to the world,” Biden said. 
APPEALS COURT TEMPORARILY BLOCKS RELEASE OF BIDEN-HUR INTERVIEW TAPES 
Biden’s memoir will allow him to provide a positive spin on a tenure that has been treated almost unanimously with bitterness in literary output since he left office. 
The only major work to offer a sympathetic view was his wife’s memoir, but even that included some scathing remarks. 
Former first lady Jill Biden revealed that she thought her husband’s June 2024 debate performance against President Donald Trump was so bad that she thought he was having a stroke. 
Many in the party fear that any revival of discussions about what went wrong for Democrats in 2024 only hurts their ability to rebuild the party, as some have said both former Vice President Kamala Harris and Jill Biden’s book tours did earlier this year. 
“We don’t need to be distracted by what the DNC says about the autopsy. 
I don’t need to be distracted about anyone’s book. 
What I need to do is to focus on making a difference in the lives of people. 
And that’s what I think they’re getting really frustrated about, is all this nonsense,” Gov. 
Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM) told reporters at a Democratic National Committee meeting. 
The title of the former president’s memoir is a reference to his last book, “Promise Me, Dad,” his 2017 memoir focused on the death of his son, Beau. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 1.3%Washington Examiner: 5.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 2.9%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Brady Knox: 3.4%Washington Examiner: 3.2%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 4.5%Brady Knox: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 1.7%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Brady Knox: 8.5%Washington Examiner: 8.6%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%Brady Knox: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Optimism Bias11.8%This article: 3.0%Brady Knox: 1.7%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 33.6%Brady Knox: 12.1%Washington Examiner: 9.3%Negativity Bias33.6%This article: 8.6%Brady Knox: 1.3%Washington Examiner: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias8.6%This article: 6.4%Brady Knox: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error6.4%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Brady Knox: 2.1%Washington Examiner: 2.2%In-Group Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.9%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Brady Knox: 1.1%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Brady Knox: 3.3%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 1.1%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 4.9%Washington Examiner: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.7%Brady Knox: 2.0%Washington Examiner: 3.0%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.5%Brady Knox: 6.7%Washington Examiner: 8.9%Hasty Generalization12.5%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.6%Brady Knox: 6.2%Washington Examiner: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion14.6%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 1.6%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.7%Brady Knox: 5.2%Washington Examiner: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.5%Brady Knox: 2.0%Washington Examiner: 2.2%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Brady Knox: 2.8%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 2.6%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.7%Brady Knox: 2.4%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 6.4%Washington Examiner: 11.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 3.4%Washington Examiner: 3.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 4.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brady Knox: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

672 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers40%attributed speech403writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 18 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Biden • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Biden • 62 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJill Biden • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jill Biden

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words11% of attributed speech72% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.