Speaker summary
80% 6 analyzed articles/videos 256.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Biden results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 72.836 hits . Analysis detected 562.505 faulty-reasoning hits from 256.667 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,908 of 28,364 speakers). This Jill Biden is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Jill Biden
Speaker details
Total words: 256.667
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 8.7% BS Score6 analyzed videos256.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 20.1% 20.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst