Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikki Schwab results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 3,194 hits . Analysis detected 26,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,757 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,158 of 6,137 authors). This Nikki Schwab is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Nikki Schwab
Author details
Total words: 21,757
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst