Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chief Campaign Correspondent results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,830 hits . Analysis detected 13,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,001 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,100 of 6,163 authors). This Chief Campaign Correspondent is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Chief Campaign Correspondent
Author details
Total words: 7,001
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.2% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.5% 14.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.3% 16.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.1% 9.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst