With White House UFC fight, Trump makes America 250 all about his favorite president - himself 79%

By Holly Baxter0%

6/15/2026, 9:22:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 81% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 2,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 711 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,803 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

There are many ways for an 80-year-old man to celebrate his birthday: a quiet brunch with family at home, a voucher for Home Depot. 
Or maybe, a giant steel octagon called ‘The Claw’ erected on your lawn for the Ultimate Fighting Championship, followed by a high-profile legal dispute. 
Joe Biden took the brunch route four years ago, when his wife shared a photograph on her Instagram account of them sharing a coconut cake with their kids and grandchildren. 
“A perfect birthday celebration filled with so much love,” she wrote at the time. 
Boy, she must feel really stupid now! 
Because it really takes a *different* kind of octogenarian to look at the White House’s South Lawn and think: *This calls for a cage fight. 
Preferably with Adam Sandler in attendance. 
*It’s a slightly baffling, truly novel idea that really summarizes how this president likes to lead. 
Unfortunately for Trump, Sandler didn’t take up the invite to the big UFC event  neither did Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson or Jared Leto. 
And then there’s those killjoys in Virginia who filed that lawsuit trying to stop it. 
But even they would have to admit that hardly anything in the world could more accurately visually summarize America today, under the leadership of Donald Trump, than a bunch of people in a cage. 
And if you’re looking for a birthday gift for Donald *and* America  both of them young in global terms and terrifyingly, worryingly old in human terms  then you can look no further than the market. 
What do you get the man who has everything? 
More* inflation*, obviously! 
As prices skyrocketed to the highest in years, the president let us in on a little secret on Wednesday: he *“loves the inflation.” 
*That’s another example of the kind of innovative, out-of-the-box kind of thinking we need around here, in this country that spent so long resting on its laurels with its *understated celebrations *and its *democratic guardrails*. 
Inflation languishing at 4.2 percent isn’t enough  for Donald, we can probably push it to six. 
Imagine the joy on his face. 
Forty dollars for a dozen eggs? 
Tears in his eyes. 
Gas at eight bucks? 
He'll get in the cage! 
Perhaps this is, after all, the natural progression of the Republic. 
What started as an experiment in a new kind of governance punctuated with occasionally brutal duels has now become… an experiment in a new kind of governance punctuated with occasionally brutal duels. 
We’ve all seen *Hamilton. 
*Those guys didn’t sit around all day, kowtowing to a load of boring bureaucrats about rules and regulations. 
They *made* the rules and regulations! 
They tore up the old script and wrote a whole new one! 
The king is out, the colonists are colonizing, Dana White is the face of America, INFLATION IS GOOD! 
Besides, what are critics *really* proposing instead? 
Sheet cake and some candles? 
Please. 
This is America. 
If you're turning 80 while occupying the most powerful office on Earth, go ahead and commemorate the occasion with title fights, giant screens, enough pyrotechnics to make a monster truck rally blush, and a “no fish-hooking” rule. 
If you don’t like it, go ahead and avert your gaze. 
And what of the lesser Americans, the ones who are not Donald Trump and don’t get a large section of the White House lawn and a rotating carousel of greased-up men duking it out, Gladiator-style, for their birthdays? 
Well, those whiny, woke snowflakes will have to get it together. 
We have to remember what we’re here for in this family  *who* we’re here for in particular. 
And what, you can’t forgive Grandpa a little war in the Middle East and a resulting economic crisis? 
On his *birthday?! 
* 
Yes, if Gramps wants a cage fight, some inflation and the occasional geopolitical crisis, then we are quite literally powerless to defy him. 
One can only hope that, since he curses most sporting event he turns up to (notable exception to the Knicks), he brings some of that energy to his own celebration. 
Because I know we all get out what we put into the world, but even America probably doesn’t deserve this. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%Holly Baxter: 1.5%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 1.1%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Holly Baxter: 2.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic8.2%This article: 9.0%Holly Baxter: 2.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic9.0%This article: 4.2%Holly Baxter: 0.8%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 4.6%Holly Baxter: 3.8%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 24.6%Holly Baxter: 4.1%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect24.6%This article: 1.5%Holly Baxter: 0.2%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.5%This article: 7.2%Holly Baxter: 1.1%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Holly Baxter: 0.7%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias1.7%This article: 15.2%Holly Baxter: 3.3%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias15.2%This article: 32.6%Holly Baxter: 6.2%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias32.6%This article: 0.8%Holly Baxter: 0.3%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.8%This article: 3.5%Holly Baxter: 0.5%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Holly Baxter: 2.3%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.9%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 1.0%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.5%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 1.4%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Holly Baxter: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.6%This article: 1.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias1.0%This article: 4.6%Holly Baxter: 5.2%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem4.6%This article: 0.7%Holly Baxter: 1.2%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.7%This article: 3.2%Holly Baxter: 1.6%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 14.5%Holly Baxter: 2.6%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma14.5%This article: 3.2%Holly Baxter: 1.7%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 4.5%Holly Baxter: 0.7%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning4.5%This article: 7.2%Holly Baxter: 12.0%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization7.2%This article: 1.5%Holly Baxter: 0.2%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring1.5%This article: 2.5%Holly Baxter: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon2.5%This article: 20.8%Holly Baxter: 3.3%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion20.8%This article: 3.0%Holly Baxter: 0.9%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 4.9%Holly Baxter: 2.9%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof1.0%This article: 4.4%Holly Baxter: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.4%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Holly Baxter: 1.8%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.6%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.7%Holly Baxter: 2.0%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.7%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.0%Holly Baxter: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.0%This article: 5.2%Holly Baxter: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading5.2%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Holly Baxter: 3.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 5.2%Holly Baxter: 1.4%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 81.0%Holly Baxter: 13.5%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice81.0%This article: 8.6%Holly Baxter: 3.0%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination8.6%This article: 2.3%Holly Baxter: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Holly Baxter: 0.1%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Holly Baxter: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.2%

711 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.2%attributed speech681writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Biden • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joe Biden

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words100% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-84.6 ptsWriter: 84.6%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Joe Biden: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.