Keyword summary
55% 44 analyzed articles/videos 14,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ufc results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 19,678 hits . Analysis detected 144,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 153,402 analyzed words across 44 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (28,500 of 34,040 keywords). This Ufc is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Ufc
Keyword details
Total words: 153,402
Article count: 44
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score44 analyzed articles153.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst