Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christoph Irmscher results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,392 hits. Analysis detected 6,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,823 of 6,364 authors). This Christoph Irmscher is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Christoph Irmscher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠56%Christoph Irmscher (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.5%20.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos