Topic summary
0% 21 analyzed articles/videos 3,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ufc results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 9,748 hits . Analysis detected 61,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,930 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,787 of 15,522 topics). This Ufc is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Ufc
Topic details
Total words: 56,930
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score21 analyzed articles56.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst