Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paulina Dedaj results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,160 hits . Analysis detected 8,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,239 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,135 of 6,628 authors). This Paulina Dedaj is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Paulina Dedaj
Author details
Total words: 6,239
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst