Author summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariana Baio results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 3,610 hits . Analysis detected 32,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,841 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,648 of 6,135 authors). This Ariana Baio is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Ariana Baio
Author details
Total words: 33,841
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles33.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst