Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Martha Ross results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 977 hits . Analysis detected 5,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Martha Ross is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Martha Ross
Author details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 18.7% 18.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 35.3% 35.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 15.7% 15.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 35.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 18.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 14.7%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst