Speaker summary
42% 15 analyzed articles/videos 565.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Tapper results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Straw Man , and Red Herring , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 77.784 hits . Analysis detected 864.972 faulty-reasoning hits from 565.667 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,126 of 28,364 speakers). This Jake Tapper is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Jake Tapper
Speaker details
Total words: 565.667
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score15 analyzed videos565.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst