Mediaite71%

Michigan Democrat Refuses to Say She’ll Support El-Sayed If He Wins His Primary In Blistering Interview 78%

By Alex Griffing68%

7/24/2026, 1:05:23 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 784 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.6% and a BS Rank of 78% (4,739 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Hillary Scholten (D-MI) went viral this week after she excoriated fellow Michigan Democrat Abdul El-Sayed and his campaigning with Hasan Piker , who in the past said “America deserved 9/11.” 
Scholten made the comments in a Wednesday night interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, who asked her if she would refuse to endorse El-Sayed, should he win his Democratic Party primary for U.S. 
Senate in her state. 
Scholten, who is supporting El-Sayed’s opponent Rep. 
Haley Stevens , made clear “I cannot, I will not even come close to being associated with comments” like those from Piker. 
“Let’s consider who’s on Abdul El-Sayed’s team, right? 
He’s been endorsed by Senator Bernie Sanders , who also was supporting Graham Platner, who had, you know, a deeply problematic record with women  credibly accused by multiple sources of sexual assault, even rape in one case. 
Rape, in one case. 
Abdul El-Sayed and Graham Platner campaigned together,” Scholten said during the interview, a point which gained a lot of attention online. 
Semafor’s political reporter Dave Weigel shared a clip of the interview and added , “Earlier in the interview, Scholten said: ‘Abdul El-Sayed and Graham Platner campaigned together. 
They fundraised together.’ 
They never campaigned together. 
El-Sayed and Platner did two (total) split send fundraising emails.” 
They fundraised together. 
You know, another thing that I find… potentially even more concerning than some of the sexist comments are, you know, some of the things that Abdul has said and gone out of his way to associate himself with when it comes to what some might see as deeply un-American comments  you know, choosing to campaign with Hasan Piker, who said America deserved September 11th. 
Sure, he went on to disavow those comments, but I’m telling you, nobody on my team would ever, you know, come even close to making a comment like that. 
“So will you  will you not back him if he wins the primary? 
Will you not support him?” 
Tapper pressed. 
“You know, Jake, I think that it’s really important to make a clear distance from yourself and these comments. 
And that’s exactly what I’ve been doing in this race. 
I cannot, I will not even come close to being associated with comments like ‘America deserved September 11,’” Scholten replied. 
“Well, he would say  Dr. 
El-Sayed would say  ‘Well, I didn’t say that, and I don’t think Hasan Piker said it, and I don’t agree with everything everybody I campaign with has said,’” Tapper pushed back. 
“But here’s the critical point on that: he might say that, right, and sure, I give him  I give them  credit for disavowing it after the fact. 
But the reality is, he also didn’t have to choose to campaign with Hasan Piker,” Scholten replied, adding: 
To me, that’s a non-starter. 
Saying something like “America deserved September 11”  call me a patriot, Jake, but saying “never forget” still means something to me, right? 
2,977 people lost their lives on September 11th. 
In the one year following September 11th, 180,000 men and women signed up to serve our country to protect us after what happened that day  many of them my age. 
We went on to see over 58,000 Purple Heart veterans, almost 6,000 who lost their lives, right? 
It’s important to focus on these facts because you’re not just going to brush aside comments like that, right? 
Comments that are deeply, deeply un-American. 
And as people are talking about right now, like the rise of the DSA  it’s not so problematic because, you know, they want better healthcare, right, for people. 
They want better environmental protections. 
What’s so concerning to a lot of people in West Michigan, I hear, is that we’re not willing to be tough on comments like that. 
“Do you worry about the direction of your party?” 
Tapper followed up. 
“I absolutely do. 
And I think that condoning behavior like this from candidates like Abdul El-Sayed is taking us in a direction that we don’t want to go as a party. 
I don’t need $20 million to study why young men stopped voting for the Democratic Party. 
Look at the message that we’re sending to our veterans if we’re willing to embrace or even brush aside comments like that. 
I would never stand on a stage or be at a rally with someone like Hasan Piker because he chose to say comments like that,” Scholten concluded. 
Watch the clip above via CNN. 
The post Michigan Democrat Refuses to Say She’ll Support El-Sayed If He Wins His Primary In Blistering Interview first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Alex Griffing: 3.9%Mediaite: 5.0%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 3.0%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Alex Griffing: 3.6%Mediaite: 3.7%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.9%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Griffing: 2.2%Mediaite: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 2.4%Alex Griffing: 12.0%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Alex Griffing: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 19.0%Alex Griffing: 9.0%Mediaite: 14.6%Negativity Bias19.0%This article: 8.4%Alex Griffing: 3.4%Mediaite: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Alex Griffing: 4.7%Mediaite: 2.2%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 4.3%Alex Griffing: 1.6%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Alex Griffing: 1.0%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Alex Griffing: 7.5%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem13.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Griffing: 0.4%Mediaite: 3.6%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 2.4%Alex Griffing: 1.0%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 3.6%Alex Griffing: 4.8%Mediaite: 1.3%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 2.4%Alex Griffing: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning2.4%This article: 4.3%Alex Griffing: 5.9%Mediaite: 7.5%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.2%Alex Griffing: 1.3%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon3.2%This article: 17.2%Alex Griffing: 14.3%Mediaite: 6.7%Appeal to Emotion17.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 1.2%Mediaite: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.0%Alex Griffing: 0.8%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 4.1%Alex Griffing: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque4.1%This article: 3.7%Alex Griffing: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof3.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.1%Alex Griffing: 0.8%Mediaite: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 3.3%Mediaite: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Alex Griffing: 1.2%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 0.4%Alex Griffing: 0.8%Mediaite: 3.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.4%This article: 7.1%Alex Griffing: 1.8%Mediaite: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice7.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.7%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Griffing: 0.0%Mediaite: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Alex Griffing: 2.7%Mediaite: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.8%

784 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers75%attributed speech194writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDave Weigel • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 65 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 23 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 31 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJake Tapper • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 3 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 28 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Scholten • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hillary Scholten

93%flagged-word coverage
492 attributed words83% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.9 ptsWriter: 28.9%Hillary Scholten: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+9.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hillary Scholten: 9.3%9.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Hillary Scholten: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.