Topic summary
⁠79%3 analyzed articles/videos3,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaigning results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 851 hits. Analysis detected 8,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,345 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (11,305 of 15,447 topics). This Campaigning is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Campaigning
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,345
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos