Keyword summary
87% 11 analyzed articles/videos 10,391 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hasan Piker results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 5,641 hits . Analysis detected 57,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,280 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,701 of 35,646 keywords). This Hasan Piker is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Hasan Piker
Keyword details
Total words: 41,280
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles41.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst