Author summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Krueger results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 6,721 hits. Analysis detected 32,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,992 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,012 of 6,366 authors). This Katherine Krueger is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Katherine Krueger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠85%Katherine Krueger (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,992
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
5.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 48.0%48.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 24.8%24.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.3%10.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.4%14.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 48.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Author 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos